Prediction of Artem Sitak vs Mao-Xin Gong Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Sitak vs M. Gong

Artem Sitak
NZL
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
39
Age
38
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
874
C. Rank
Ret.
299
Best Rank
294
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$15.8K
Career Money
$520
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Mao-Xin Gong
CHN
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
39
Age
38
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
874
C. Rank
Ret.
299
Best Rank
294
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$15.8K
Career Money
$520
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sitak 1 - 0 Gong
They have played 3 sets in total, with Artem Sitak winning 2 and Mao-Xin Gong winning 1. The last match between Artem Sitak and Mao-Xin Gong was at the Kyoto Challenger, 06-03-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Artem Sitak getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sitak | 1 |
| Gong | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Kyoto Challenger(03-06-13)
Artem Sitak
6
6
6
Mao-Xin Gong
7
1
3
A. Sitak vs M. Gong H2H Profile
A. Sitak vs M. Gong Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Artem Sitak has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Artem Sitak, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Artem Sitak has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mao-Xin Gong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Artem Sitak has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mao-Xin Gong winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Artem Sitak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 109/82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/8). Mao-Xin Gong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 185/140), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 9/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Artem Sitak has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mao-Xin Gong has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Artem Sitak winning 1 times and Mao-Xin Gong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Artem Sitak winning 2 and Mao-Xin Gong winning 1.
- The last match between Artem Sitak and Mao-Xin Gong was at the Kyoto Challenger, 06-03-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Artem Sitak getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:6.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Artem Sitak has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mao-Xin Gong has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Artem Sitak has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Artem Sitak has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mao-Xin Gong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Artem Sitak vs Mao-Xin Gong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Sitak vs M. Gong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:22:6 | Average Match Time | 2:22:6 |
| 48% (54/113) | 1st Serve % | 55% (59/107) |
| 72% (39/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (37/59) |
| 47% (28/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (19/48) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 18% (2/11) |
| 48% (51/107) | Return Points Win % | 41% (46/113) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sitak 0%, Gong 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sitak 0%, Gong 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Sitak 0%, Gong 0%.
A. Sitak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 2-0 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
M. Gong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | ||
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||

A. Sitak vs M. Gong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.79% (360/297) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.06% (212/173) |
| 54.07% (810/688) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.60% (465/419) |
| 51.69% (7079/6616) | Games Win/Loss | 51.47% (4209/3968) |
| 56.39% (203/157) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.92% (185/140) |
| 57.07% (109/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 47.37% (45/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 545 | Aces Total | 261 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 513 | Total Double Faults | 338 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 540.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 571.02 |
| 56% (4266/7634) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3624/6102) |
| 69% (2949/4266) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2380/3624) |
| 45% (1515/3368) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1147/2478) |
| 43% (309/727) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (223/507) |
| 40% (2942/7421) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2232/5958) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 35.59% (21/38) | Main Tour W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 50.00% (120/120) | Challenger W/L | 49.17% (59/61) |
| 61.43% (215/135) | Futures W/L | 60.73% (150/97) |
| 55% (352/640) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (203/372) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 48% (69/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (49/104) |
| 51% (97/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (70/116) |
| 84% (351/295) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (199/176) |
| 16% (351/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (199/22) |
| 20% (304/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (186/35) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal